Tag: space.com

  • The Brightest Planets in September’s Night Sky: How to See Them (and When)

    Eye-popping Venus, low-riding Mercury and stealthy Saturn will all make appearances among the bright objects in September’s night sky, and this day-by-day description shows how to find them.

    This month, Mercury might be glimpsed very low near the west-southwest horizon while Saturn gets lower each evening in the southwest at dusk. Meanwhile Mars, Jupiter and Venus have crossed into the morning sky, but only dazzling Venus is readily seen at dawn as it rapidly rises higher each morning.  It hovers just to the upper right of the waning crescent moon in the wee hours of the Sept. 10.  Mars is in the general vicinity, although it glows only a fraction as bright as Venus. During the second week of September, Jupiter appears against the bright morning twilight and becomes easier and easier to see during the latter part of the month. This video explains which planets are visible in the September night sky.

    Remember, you can use your clenched fist at arm’s length — equal to roughly 10 degrees of the night sky — to measure off angular distances and locate planets on display. Here’s a look at when to see the brightest planets in the September night sky, if local weather conditions cooperate:

    Sep. 4: About half to three-quarters of an hour after sunset, scan the horizon just south of due west to spot the planet Mercury.  Mercury is 27 degrees east of the Sun this evening, the furthest it will get in 2015, but it is still difficult to see from northern latitudes as it sets  in bright twilight less than an hour after sundown. Binoculars will be needed to see it.  Farther south, Mercury sets in a darker sky and is visible to the naked eye, at least early this month.  Mercury will pass between the Earth and the Sun, a condition called inferior conjunction, on the night of September 30th. [Do You Know Venus? Take Our Quiz]

    Sep. 10: Venus is rising — or might we say “erupting” — into view along the eastern horizon at the break of dawn at the start of the month; it comes up earlier in a darker sky as each day passes. It will shine at its greatest brilliance (an eye-popping magnitude -4.8 on astronomers’ brightness scale, which is 23 times brighter than the brightest star in the sky) on September 20th, and by month’s end it rises more than two hours before dawn’s early light.  Recall that Venus was at inferior conjunction on August 15th, in line between the Earth and Sun. Now it is swinging away from that line, speeding ahead of the Earth in its faster orbit.  So in a telescope it displays a large, brilliant, beautiful crescent that waxes in phase all month while shrinking in size.  Early in the morning, a narrow crescent Moon can be seen sitting about 2 1/2 degrees to the left of Venus, while about a half dozen degrees to the left of the Moon sits orange-yellow Mars shining at an unusually dim magnitude of 1.8.  In all, a gorgeous eye-catching sight to start the day!

    Sep. 11: Jupiter begins emerging into view, in an almost vertical leap up from the east horizon during September’s morning twilight.  Having passed conjunction with the Sun on August 26th, Jupiter rises about an hour before sunup. By month’s end Jupiter will be rising more than 2 hours before sunrise and will be readily visible in the predawn eastern sky.  [101 Best Night Sky Photos of 2014 by Stargazers]

    Sep. 18: Saturn, in Libra, is relatively inconspicuous in the southwest when night begins.  It is only about half as bright as it was at opposition last May, but still slightly brighter than Antares, the heart of the celestial scorpion Scorpius.  This evening Saturn can be found about 2 1/2 degrees to the left of a crescent Moon.  Saturn spends September drawing closer to Antares and by the end of the month will be 11 degrees to the star’s right. 

    Sep. 25Mars glides 0.8 degrees to the north of the first magnitude star Regulus; the red planet is then half a magnitude fainter than the bluish star. The contrasting duo is 11 degrees to the lower left of Venus and 10 degrees above and to the right of Jupiter.

    Editor’s note: If you capture an amazing view of the August full moon, or any other night sky view, and want to share it with Space.com for a story or gallery, send images and comments in to manaing editor Tariq Malik at: spacephotos@space.com.

    Joe Rao serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York’s Hayden Planetarium. He writes about astronomy for Natural History magazine, the Farmer’s Almanac and other publications, and he is also an on-camera meteorologist for News 12 Westchester, N.Y. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

  • Constellations, Planets And A Super Lunar Eclipse – Sept. 2015 Skywatching Video

    Credit: Space Telescope Science Institute, Office of Public Outreach

  • Rare Super 'Blood Moon' Lunar Eclipse Coming, Last Until 2033 | Video

    Credit: NASA/GSFC

  • Life Might Spread Across Universe Like an 'Epidemic' in New Math Theory

    Panspermia Illustration
    If life can spread from star to star, researchers should see a characteristic pattern of overlapping growth. In this theoretical artist’s conception of the Milky Way galaxy, translucent green “bubbles” mark areas where life has spread beyond its home system to create cosmic oases, a process called panspermia.
    Credit: NASA/JPL/R. Hurt

    As astronomers get closer to finding potential signatures of life on faraway planets, a new mathematical description shows how to understand life’s spread — and to determine if it’s jumping from star to star.

    If life arose on other planets, did it spontaneously grow from raw materials every time? Or did it dart from planet to planet and star to star, spreading across the universe? Telltale mathematical patterns of where life signatures appear could reveal the answer, authors of the new research said.

    “Life could spread from host star to host star in a pattern similar to the outbreak of an epidemic,” study co-author Avi Loeb of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) said in a statement. “In a sense, the Milky Way galaxy would become infected with pockets of life.” [10 Alien Planets That May Support Life]

    The concept of life spreading across different planets and stars is called panspermia — whether microscopic organisms hitch a ride on an asteroid or intelligent beings plot a course for new horizons. Mathematically, both of those situations would show the same basic pattern, the new research shows.

    “In our theory, clusters of life form, grow and overlap like bubbles in a pot of boiling water,” the study’s lead author Henry Lin, also at CfA, said in the same statement. With that kind of growth, life would fill the universe much more quickly than if it arose only through spontaneous development.

    As telescopes increase in power and researchers learn more about the substances and conditions, spotted from afar, that would herald extraterrestrial life, scientists get closer to potentially identifying such signs of life on other planets. And if life appears in distinct clusters that contain many different stars, it makes it much more likely that organisms can proliferate across the galaxy.

    The tricky part is identifying those patterns while embedded inside them, only able to see a certain selection of stars. According to the new research, humans could get lucky and be on the edge of a bubble of life; if that were the case, astronomers would glimpse many instances of life on one side of Earth, and few to none on the other. It would be clear that life is spreading instead of growing spontaneously each time. But even if Earth was in a less favorable location, statistical analysis of the life-filled spots discovered could still reveal the characteristic pattern.

    The transfer of life from star to star, through a species’ exploration or by natural events in the galaxy, would drastically speed up the transition from an empty galaxy to a life-filled one, the researchers said in the paper. Then, it might be only a matter of time before humans ran up against something otherworldly.

    The research was recently accepted for publication by The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

    Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her @SarahExplains. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

  • Second Cosmic Ray Detector Delivered to Space Station

    Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) Experiment
    The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) experiment is a state-of-the-art particle physics detector that was attached to the space station in 2011. It will now be joined by the Calorimetric Electron Telescope, a detector that will be used to measure even more energetic cosmic rays.
    Credit: NASA

    In addition to ferrying tons of food, water and supplies to the International Space Station, a Japanese cargo ship that arrived on Monday (Aug. 23) carried an astrophysics telescope that will join the flagship Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer in hunting for cosmic rays.

    NEWS: Mystery Signal Could be Dark Matter Hint in ISS Detector

    The Calorimetric Electron Telescope, or CALET, was due to be mounted on a platform outside Japan’s Kibo laboratory on Tuesday (Aug. 24), joining the $2 billion AMS particle detector, which was attached to the station in 2011.

    Once operational, CALET will precisely measure cosmic rays, at even higher energies than AMS.

    Cosmic rays come at you from all directions and all the time … Every time one of these high-energy cosmic rays comes at us and starts triggering the instrument, we record it,” astrophysicist John Wefel, with Louisiana State University, said in a NASA TV interview.

    NEWS: Dark Matter Mystery Deepens

    Ground-based instruments can indirectly detect cosmic rays by measuring secondary particles that are created when the rays strike the atmosphere. By studying the cosmic rays directly in space, scientists hope to develop a better understanding of where they come from, what they are made of and how they come to have so much energy.

    The cosmic rays also may shed light on so-called “dark matter,” which unlike regular matter does not emit detectable electromagnetic radiation. Dark matter, which comprises about 27 percent of the universe, can be indirectly detected by studying how its gravity influences nearby objects.

    Regular matter adds up to less than 5 percent of the universe. The rest of the universe, roughly 68 percent, is filled with a mysterious anti-gravity force known as dark energy.

    Top 10 Space Stories of the Decade

    While AMS can detect electrons, protons, nuclei and antimatter at a range of energy levels, CALET is focused on high-energy electrons.

    “CALET addresses many outstanding high-energy astrophysics questions such as the origin of cosmic rays, how cosmic ray accelerate and travel across the galaxy; and the existence of dark matter and nearby cosmic-ray sources,” NASA said in a summary of the program.

    The telescope, which will be mounted outside the station, is expected to operate for up to five years. A third astrophysics observatory, known as Cosmic Ray Energetics and Mass for the International Space Station, or ISS-CREAM, is due to launch next year.

    This article was provided by Discovery News.

  • Beyond Pluto: 2nd Target Chosen for New Horizons Probe

    NASA’s New Horizons probe, which flew past Pluto last month, now has a second target to aim for.

    The New Horizons team has selected an object named 2014 MU69, which lies roughly 1 billion miles (1.6 billion kilometers) beyond Pluto, as the next target for up-close study by the spacecraft, NASA announced today (Aug. 28).

    However, the space agency still must officially approve a New Horizons mission extension for the second flyby to take place in 2019. [Destination Pluto: NASA’s New Horizons Mission in Pictures]

    “Even as the New Horizons spacecraft speeds away from Pluto out into the Kuiper Belt, and the data from the exciting encounter with this new world is being streamed back to Earth, we are looking outward to the next destination for this intrepid explorer,” John Grunsfeld, chief of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, said in a statement.

    The $720 million New Horizons probe traveled for nearly 10 years and 3 billion miles (4.8 billion km) to reach Pluto and its moons, becoming the first mission to study the dwarf planet system up close. It will take roughly 16 months for the probe to beam home all the data it collected during the encounter.

    The successful July 14 flyby already ensures that New Horizons will go down in history as a roaring success, but the odds are good that the spacecraft will be collecting more data in the future. NASA commonly approves mission extensions for spacecraft that have finished their primary objective and are still in good working order.

    Still, the New Horizons team must submit an extension proposal to NASA that will “be evaluated by an independent team of experts before NASA can decide about the go-ahead,” the statement said.

    Artist's impression of NASA's New Horizons spacecraft encountering a Pluto-like object in the distant Kuiper Belt. NASA announced today (Aug. 28, 2015) that it has selected 2014 MU69 as its first choice for the probe's secondary mission.

    Artist’s impression of NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft encountering a Pluto-like object in the distant Kuiper Belt. NASA announced today (Aug. 28, 2015) that it has selected 2014 MU69 as its first choice for the probe’s secondary mission.
    Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI/Alex Parker

    That proposal is due in 2016, but the New Horizons team must start planning for an encounter with 2014 MU69 right away. The team will execute a series of four maneuvers in October and November of this year to put the probe on a path to encounter the new object. Any later course corrections will require more fuel and “add mission risk,” the statement said. If the extension is approved, the probe is expected to reach 2014 MU69 on Jan. 1, 2019.

    Alan Stern, principal investigator for New Horizons at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, called 2014 MU69 a “great choice,” for the secondary mission. Discovered in 2014 by the Hubble Space Telescope, scientists estimate it is just under 30 miles (48 km) in diameter, or between 0.5 and 1 percent the size of Pluto.

    In 2014, Hubble identified five objects that New Horizons could potentially reach after its encounter with Pluto. The list was later narrowed down to two prime candidates, including 2014 MU69.

    The Kuiper Belt is a largely unexplored region of the solar system; NASA’s twin Voyager probes passed through it, but did not make close encounters with any objects, including Pluto. Scientists believe objects in the Kuiper Belt have remained largely unchanged since the formation of the solar system 4.6 billion years ago, and may therefore serve as a kind of time capsule, containing clues about the formation of Earth and its cosmic family.

    Follow Calla Cofield @callacofield.Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

  • Solar Storms Are Amping Up the Northern Lights This Week

    Aurora Borealis Photo by 'Aurora Dora'
    An image of the Aurora Borealis, taken by night sky photographer Dora Miller (also known as Aurora Dora) on Aug. 22, 2015, in Talkeetna, Alaska.
    Credit: Dora Miller

    Space weather events that have been building over the last week continued to affect Earth early this morning (Aug. 28), increasing the possibility of amped up auroras around the planet’s polar regions.

    A string of space weather occurrences this week has led to some beautiful aurora displays, such as the one seen in the picture above. But showers of powerful particles from the sun can also cause problems for power grids, satellites and astronauts, so government agencies are keeping a close eye on the activity.

    The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued a G3 Geomagnetic Storm Warning, valid through 3 a.m. EDT (0700 GMT) today. The rating scale for geomagnetic storms ranges from G1 (minor) to G5 (extreme) with G3 considered “strong.” NOAA also publishes a map of aurora forecasts based on solar activity.

    Solar storms and geomagnetic storms are caused by explosions of particles from the sun, as well as the steady stream of particles called the solar wind. The so-called “K-index” is also used to characterize how severely a storm is affecting Earth’s magnetic field. NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) regularly updates its Web page to show the K-index value on an hourly basis, so citizens can see how a solar storm is affecting the planet. The K-index currently shows a rise in activity in the Earth’s magnetic field over the past three days.

    The “unrest could continue for another day,” according to Spaceweather.com.

    NASA released a statement earlier this week about a mid-level solar flare that peaked at 3:33 a.m. EDT (0733 GMT) on Monday (Aug. 24). Solar flares release high amounts of X-rays and additional energy into space, but they do not cause solar or geomagnetic storms unless they are associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME), which spew clouds of particles. CMEs and the particles in the solar wind can cause reactions with atoms in Earth’s upper atmosphere that create the light displays known as the auroras.

    Follow Calla Cofield @callacofieldFollow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

  • The Herschel/Planck Mission

  • Constellation Lunar Mission

  • ESA’s Special Delivery

  • Last Moments of LCROSS – NASA Probes Hit Moon

  • Meet the New Space Station Crew

  • Auroras Dance Over Saturn’s Poles

  • Arsenic Eating Bacteria Hint at Alien Life

  • IMAX Hubble 3D: The Director’s Take – Exclusive Video

  • Splashdown! Ares I-X’s Fall to Earth

  • Planning the Assault: Why Bomb the Moon?

  • The 1st Repeat Space Tourist

  • Where is ET?: SETI vs. the Fermi Paradox

  • Fly By Neptune’s Freezing Moon Triton

  • ISS: We may be changing the course of human destiny.

  • The Serious Search for Intelligent Life: 4 Key Questions

  • Transforming the Shuttle

  • STS-130: Mission Overview

  • Way Off Road: On The Moon

  • Return with Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

  • Constellation on Mars

  • Inside Japan’s New H-2B Rocket

  • Acrobat Space Tourist on Flight Training

  • The Legacy of Space Shuttle Atlantis

  • Building Japan’s First Spaceship

  • How to Find 'Strange Life' on Alien Planets

    Super-Earth GJ 1214b
    This artist’s rendition of the super-Earth GJ 1214b shows it in orbit around a dim red dwarf star. If the atmosphere is thick in hydrogen, scientists may be able to spot signs of alien life.
    Credit: CfA/David Aguilar

    Detecting signs of life very different from that of Earth in the atmospheres of alien planets may be difficult, but it is possible, researchers say.

    A team of scientists examined models of “super-Earths” — exoplanets slightly larger than Earth — to determine how easily signs of life could be spotted. They determined that such biosignatures could be identified more easily on planets orbiting stars producing relatively low amounts of radiation — but even then only if everything worked out just right.

    The team, led by Sara Seager of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), did not focus solely on Earth-like life. [10 Exoplanets That Could Host Alien Life

    “What we’ve been trying to do is move away from that,” William Bains, also of MIT, said during the Astrobiology Science Conference in Chicago in June. Bains worked with Seager and Renyu Hu to study super-Earths with hydrogen-rich atmospheres. “We wanted to build a model of biosignatures independent of Earth’s biology.”

    ‘A dynamic process’

    Super-Earths are worlds up to 10 times more massive than our planet. Because of their size, they are more likely to retain an atmosphere rich in molecular hydrogen. The girth of super-Earths also makes them easier to discover, and their atmosphereseasier to characterize, relative to their Earth-size cousins. Hydrogen-rich super-Earths are now known to be quite commonthroughout the galaxy.

    Bains and his colleagues simulated a planet 10 times as massive and nearly twice as wide as Earth, with an atmosphere rich in molecular hydrogen. Their simulations placed the planet in an orbit around three different types of stars: a sunlike star, a normal red dwarf (a star smaller and dimmer than the sun) and and an especially inactive red dwarf. (Different stellar types produce different levels of ultraviolet radiation, with the sunlike star producing the most, which affects how molecules break down in the atmosphere of orbiting planets.)

    To search for biosignatures, Bains said, it’s important to understand why forms of life produce gas in the first place. Some gas is produced as a byproduct when energy is captured from the atmosphere. Other gases are byproducts of metabolic reactions, such as photosynthesis. The third type is created by life not as a result of its central chemical production but from stress, for signaling and in other functions.

    “Life is a dynamic process,” Bains said.

    Alien Planet Quiz: Are You an Exoplanet Expert?

    Astronomers have confirmed more than 800 planets beyond our own solar system, and the discoveries keep rolling in. How much do you know about these exotic worlds?

    Artist's conception of alien planets Kepler-36b and c

    0 of 10 questions complete

    Alien Planet Quiz: Are You an Exoplanet Expert?

    Astronomers have confirmed more than 800 planets beyond our own solar system, and the discoveries keep rolling in. How much do you know about these exotic worlds?

    Start Quiz
    Artist's conception of alien planets Kepler-36b and c

    0 of questions complete

    The byproducts of life

    After determining what gases could survive in the atmosphere, the scientists then calculated how much biomass would be needed to produce a detectable amount, and whether or not such an amount of life would be reasonable to find.

    The team found four volatiles that would be generated by the production of energy in a hydrogen-rich atmosphere. Of them, three could be formed geologically, making them unreliable biosignatures.

    “This was really disappointing,” Bains said.

    The only interesting biosignature that the team came up in the first class was ammonia (NH3). For ammonia to be created, life would have to find a way to break the bonds between molecular nitrogen and molecular hydrogen. On Earth, synthetic chemistry can break each molecule apart individually, but no known system is capable of breaking both at once. Still, the team remains hopeful that a form of life could evolve on other worlds capable of capitalizing on the possibility.

    Producing a detectable amount of ammonia in the atmosphere of a distant super-Earth would require a layer of life less than one bacterial cell thick, researchers said.

    “Even if it was deader than the deadest place on Earth, we could detect it,” Bains said.

    That’s the case for super-Earths orbiting sunlike stars, anyway. For alien planets receiving lower levels of ultraviolet radiation, such as those orbiting standard or quiet red dwarfs, the required biomass would need to be significantly higher.

    While scientists should be able to detect ammonia in the atmosphere of distant planets, determining if it stems from life is another matter. At present, uncertainties about the size and mass of exoplanets remain high enough that worlds presently thought to be super-Earths could, in fact, be mini-Neptunes, gas giants smaller than those found in the solar system.

    Disregarding the fact that surface conditions on gas planets would be essentially nonexistent, the deep atmospheres could produce ammonia without the aid of life. Determining whether a planet is a super-Earth or a mini-Neptune requires probing atmospheric pressures near the surface, something that even NASA’s upcoming James Webb Space Telescopewill be unable to accomplish, researchers said. [‪Building The James Webb Space Telescope (Photos)]

    Even if scientists could conclusively identify a planet as rocky, it’s possible that the world could have collected ammonia during its evolution, as Saturn’s moon, Titan, did. Ices on the surface could break down with either internal heat or with the help of ultraviolet radiation, releasing ammonia into the atmosphere to create a false positive.

    So, without getting up close to these distant worlds, characterizing whether ammonia in the atmosphere comes from life remains a significant challenge.

    The research that formed the basis of Bains’ talk at the astrobiology conference was published in late 2013 in The Astrophysical Journal

    ‘In our favor’

    Seager, Bains and Hu also considered another group of gases — those produced for biomass building. Capturing energy from the environment requires energy. On Earth, a prime example is the oxygen plants release during the process of photosynthesis.

    Unfortunately, the team was unable to identify any potentially useful biosignature gases of this type in a hydrogen-rich atmosphere. The gases that life might produce would be expected to exist naturally in the atmosphere of such a world, Bains said.

    As a third option, the team examined molecules produced unrelated to energy generation. The presence of such gases would depend on the amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the atmosphere, because high UV levels lead to the creation of lots of destructive hydrogen ions.

    Planets orbiting sunlike stars, which emit lots of UV light, would therefore need an enormous density of biomass to produce biosignatures high enough to reach detectable levels. Even around a normal red dwarf, the values would need to be high, though they could be plausible when compared to Earth’s biomass surface density range.

    According to the team, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) could spot evidence of biosignatures gas “if and only if every single factor is in our favor.”

    Detecting life using JWST would require a pool of transiting planets around nearby red dwarfs. Because the stars are so dim, they would need to be relatively close to Earth in order for scientists to study their planets. These planets would need a molecular hydrogen atmosphere, which would be easier to study than a more Earth-like atmosphere. The star itself would need to be quiet, with little radiation. Finally, the planet itself must have life that produces a detectable gas as a biosignature.

    “We will have the ability to predict some biosignatures gas independent of Earth,” Bains said. “But it’s going to be really hard to detect.”

    Follow Nola Taylor Redd on Twitter @NolaTRedd Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

  • Syfy Channel's 'Dark Matter' Finale Tonight Brings Shocking Revelation

    Jodelle Ferland Plays 'Five' in 'Dark Matter'
    In the Syfy original series “Dark Matter,” six people wake up on a spaceship with no memory of who they are. Jodelle Ferland plays “Five.”
    Credit: Syfy

    Syfy’s space-based TV series “Dark Matter” wraps up its first season tonight (Aug. 28) with back-to-back episodes and a jaw-dropping revelation that even the cast didn’t see coming.

    Dark Matter” is the story of six people who wake up on a derelict spaceship with no idea who they are or how they got there. As the group members slowly discover clues about their past, they face struggles of identity and redemption.

    In the second-to-last episode of the season, former “Star Trek: The Next Generation” cast member Wil Wheaton guest stars as a delightfully evil villain. During the season finale, hard-won alliances begin to unravel as it becomes clear that the crew is being betrayed. The last moments of the finale contain a dramatic revelation that even the show’s cast called “shocking,” during a press call held earlier this week. 

    Four of the seven central cast members of “Dark Matter” told members of the press that they didn’t know how the series would end until the very last day of shooting. Throughout filming, the cast said they had theories as to how the season would end but were still blown away by the final reveal. It was the show’s creator, executive producer and showrunner Joe Mallozzi, who decided to keep it hidden. However, Mallozzi said during the call that he did leave hints throughout the show about what would happen.

    Wil Wheaton on 'Dark Matter'

    Wil Wheaton guest stars as an evil villain in the second-to-last episode of the Syfy original series “Dark Matter.”
    Credit: Syfy

    Mallozzi spoke with Space.com earlier this year about some of the exciting science fiction concepts featured in “Dark Matter,” including faster-than-light travel by clone. He said on the press call that, while the first season of the show was focused mainly on developing the characters, if it gets picked up for a second season, he would like to focus on more world-building. Mallozzi also wrote the graphic novel that the show is based on, and is a veteran science fiction television writer who, among other credits, was heavily involved in the “Stargate” franchise.

    Syfy also debuted the original science fiction show “Killjoys” earlier this year. That show wrapped up on Aug. 15. Select episodes of both shows are available to watch free on the Syfy network website.

    Follow Calla Cofield @callacofieldFollow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

  • Parachute Failure Success! NASA Drop Tests Orion Capsule Over Arizona | Video

  • Dwarf Planet Ceres Global Highs And Lows Animated | Video

    Dwarf Planet Ceres Global Highs And Lows Animated | Video

  • Explorers Powered By Fission? NASA Investigates | Video

    Future Explorers Powered By Fission? NASA Investigates | Video

  • ISS Module Move Makes Way For U.S. Commercial Spacecraft | Animation

    ISS Module Move Makes Way For U.S. Commercial Spacecraft | Animation

  • Pluto And Charon Orbital Dance - New Horizons Gets Closer | Video

    Pluto And Charon Orbital Dance – New Horizons Gets Closer | Video

  • Eyes On Pluto - How Our View Has Changed | Video

    Eyes On Pluto – How Our View Has Changed | Video

  • What A Blue Moon Looks Like In Space | Time-Lapse Video

    What A Blue Moon Looks Like In Space | Time-Lapse Video

  • Hubble Space Telescope Is A Rock Star | Video

    Hubble Space Telescope Is A Rock Star | Video

  • Blast Off! New ISS Crew Launches After 2 Month Delay | Video

    Blast Off! New ISS Crew Launches After 2 Month Delay | Video

  • Cubesats To 'Hitch' Ride To Mars On Lander Flight | Video

    Cubesats To ‘Hitch’ Ride To Mars On Lander Flight | Video

  • Van_der_Waals_force

    Gecko Feet Teach NASA How To Stick To Space Objects | Video

  • Space_Launch_System

    NASA Tests New ‘Brain’ for Old RS-25 Rocket Engine | Video

  • Disaster Response 'RoboSimian': What Can It Do? | Video

    Disaster Response ‘RoboSimian’: What Can It Do? | Video

  • Two-Stage NASA Sounding Rocket Goes Sub-Orbital | Video

    Two-Stage NASA Sounding Rocket Goes Sub-Orbital | Video

  • Ceres' Mysterious Bright Spots Coming Into Focus | Video

    Ceres’ Mysterious Bright Spots Coming Into Focus | Video

  • Pluto-Palooza! Anticipation Grows For New Horizons' Fly-By | Video

    Pluto-Palooza! Anticipation Grows For New Horizons’ Fly-By | Video

  • Ceres' Bright Spots Origins Still Unknown - New Imagery Video

    Ceres Bright Spots’ Origins Still Unknown – New Imagery Video

  • NASA Crashes Small Plane To Test Emergency Transmitter | Video

    NASA Crashes Small Plane To Test Emergency Transmitter | Video

  • Dwarf Planet Ceres' Violent Past On Display In Animated Fly-Over Video

    Dwarf Planet Ceres’ Violent Past Etched Into Its Face | Video

  • Celestial 'Fireworks' Anticipation Grows With NASA Cinematic Treatment | Video

    Celestial ‘Fireworks’ Anticipation Grows With NASA Cinematic Treatment | Video

  • NASA Vehicle Changes Everything About Driving | Video

    NASA Vehicle Changes Everything About Driving | Video

  • Dark Side Of Ceres No More - Dawn Snaps North Pole | Video

    Dark Side Of Ceres No More – Dawn Snaps North Pole | Video

  • Obama’s Goals For NASA - How’s Progress? | Video

    Obama’s Goals For NASA – How’s Progress? | Video

  • Is NASA Serious About Humans To Mars? | Video

    Credit: Space.com

  • Sampling Enceladus: Is Earth Ready for Pieces of Saturn Moon's Plumes?

    Plumes of Enceladus Image
    The plumes of Saturn’s moon Enceladus, as seen by NASA’s Cassini probe in 2009.
    Credit: NASA/JPL/SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE

    Many astrobiologists are champing at the bit to bring back samples from Saturn’s ocean-harboring moon Enceladus, but others say it may be best to exercise a little patience.

    In 2005, NASA’s Cassini spacecraft discovered that geysers blast from Enceladus’ south polar region, sending material from the ice-covered moon’s subsurface ocean far out into space. It’s tempting to grab samples from Enceladus’ plume and return them to labs on Earth for analysis as soon as possible, but a slower, more methodical plan may be the right way to assess the moon’s life-hosting potential, one prominent space scientist says.

    “Who is going to approve a sample-return mission if we’re not sure the stuff in the plumes is worth bringing back to a terrestrial lab?” Brent Sherwood, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, said at the Astrobiology Science Conference in Chicago in June. [Photos: Enceladus, Saturn’s Icy Moon Revealed

    “These are very hard decisions for decision makers to make when there are a lot of zeros after the dollar signs,” added Sherwood, who manages the Innovation Foundry, which pulls together the conception, capture, planning and engineering of JPL space science missions.

    Step by step

    Infographic: Surface and interior of Enceladus.

    The 310-mile-wide (500 kilometers) Enceladus is one of the solar system’s best bets to host alien life, researchers say. The satellite harbors large amounts of subsurface liquid water and also features an energy source: internal heat generated by the gravitational tug of Saturn.

    Other worlds throughout the solar system — such as Jupiter moons Europa, Ganymede and Callisto, as well as the dwarf planet Ceres — are known or suspected to host underground oceans. NASA has already taken an intriguing first look at many of these worlds, thanks to the Voyager, Galileo, Cassini and Dawn missions, among others.

    The next step, according to Sherwood, is to chemically characterize these worlds’ oceans both directly and indirectly. If something interesting is found, then it needs to be confirmed. At that point, a consensus may be reached that sample return is a necessary step. (Analyzing samples in well-equipped labs on Earth is the best way to search for signs of alien life, many researchers say.)

    The best way to do all of this is to establish a step-by-step exploration program for the ocean worlds similar to the one NASA has developed for Mars, Sherwood argued.

    “A lot of money has flowed into the prospect that Mars is habitable,” he said.

    Sampling the plumes

    Enceladus is special among the ocean worlds because of the plumes; spacecraft can sample the moon’s subsurface sea without even touching down. (NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope spotted signs of plumes on Europa several years ago, but these phenomena have not yet been confirmed.)

    But it’s still preferable to conduct a detailed analysis of Enceladus’ plumes in situ before mounting a sample-return mission, Sherwood said. Although Cassini has flown through the plumes and analyzed their components, the spacecraft wasn’t designed with this task in mind.

    Protecting Earth against potential alien contamination would be a significant issue, Sherwood added.

    “You’ve got to demonstrate that you’ve got the means for planetary protection because you’re bringing stuff back,” he said.

    Despite decades of in-depth study, no samples have been brought back to Earth from Mars, though NASA’s Mars 2020 rover mission plans to cache material to return in the future.

    Sherwood said achieving a sample-return mission to Enceladus requires step-by-step preparation. Given the estimated 14-year round trip such a mission would endure, not to mention the time spent developing missions, having a sample back on Earth by 2049 requires scientists to begin advocating today.

    “A lot of scientists say, ‘No, I don’t want to wait that long because I’m not going to live that long,” Sherwood said. “If you never get started, it takes infinitely long.”

    Every 10 years, the U.S. National Research Council’s Decadal Survey looks into the future another decade to prioritize research areas, observations and potential missions. The next decadal survey will be published in 2021 and will affect decisions made in 2023. The survey is influenced by concepts submitted between 2018 and 2020, and has a September 2019 deadline.

    This gives scientists a short period of time to influence the next era of discovery.

    “We live in a pivotal time,” Sherwood said. “One hundred years ago, no one could have imagined us doing the kind of exploration we’re doing today.”

    Follow Nola Taylor Redd on Twitter @NolaTRedd. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.